Buy Our Product. Hurt People.
Advertising is often about comparison: our product is better than their product.
It’s not uncommon for that to extend to a representation of the people using the products. That is, because our product is better than their product, the users of our product have some advantage over those who use their product. They may be happier, more successful, sexier, wealthier, etc.
Sometimes, this rubs off on the user of the superior product, making them kind of cocky. They’ve made the right choice, and they seem to feel that that makes them better than the poor slob who’s stuck with Brand X.
It’s one thing for the winning consumer to be a bit of an asshole, but some advertisers now appear to have decided that picking the right product gives one the right to take things a step or two further.
In a current spot for National Car Rental, John McEnroe explains the advantages of National’s Emerald Club and its new Emerald Aisle (faith and begorrah) feature: not only can you bypass the counter and all the paperwork, but you just go into the lot and pick whichever car you’d like.
Sounds pretty good, right? Keep in mind that this is John McEnroe, who is equally famous for tennis and temper. He demonstrates his freedom of choice in a lot full of cars by yelling, “Hey, Pal! That car’s mine!” at what appears to be one of maybe three other customers there, pulling a tennis racket and ball out of his carry-on, and serving the ball right into the poor man’s head, knocking him to the concrete, coffee cup, briefcase and all. If the tennis ball doesn’t give him a concussion, I’m sure the pavement does.
It should be noted that the Emerald Club rules stipulate that:
National Car Rental may disqualify any Member for any reason including such Member’s unacceptable driving record. Such disqualification is effective when it is entered into National Car Rental’s computer system.
I wonder if “any reason” includes assault on fellow Emerald Club members.
We’ve got a similar situation with Hall’s cough drops.
In the old days, a Hall’s ad would involve a person who had a bit of a cough or congestion. They’d pop a Hall’s and that menthol-lyptus stuff would go to work, sending waves of gentle, healing warmth through them, and they’d find themselves cleared out, comfortable, and happy. Nice and simple. But no more.
In a current spot on the eye of hell, our protagonist is in an elevator, standing right in the middle of the car. The door opens, and someone walks in. Our hero is pushed a bit to the side, expresses a touch of irritation on his face, and moves back into the middle of the car. The door opens again, and again he has to move out of the way to let someone through, again he becomes a little irritated, and again he moves back into the center of the elevator. The door opens yet again, and our hero is not a happy guy. You’d think that by now he’d have figured out that if he moved into a corner of the elevator, he could finish his ride thoroughly untouched, but he seems to believe that he has the right both to stand in the center and to have an invisible buffer zone around him. He thinks that other people should enter the elevator by pressing themselves up against the wall and squeezing by him as carefully and respectfully as possible.
So what does he do about it? He pulls out a Hall’s and pops it into his mouth. We see those waves of warmth and comfort like before… but something is different. Those waves are now weapons, forcing the other people up against the wall and literally flattening them — most likely causing permanent damage, perhaps death.
Is this really the message advertisers want to send? When did it become necessary for consumers to feel so superior for purchasing the right product that they believe they have the right to kill?
Tags: Advertising, Emerald Aisle, Emerald Club, Hall's, John McEnroe, National Car Rental, Violence
Bart Dickens on 21 Nov 2008 at 10:39 pm #
Right On!
I found myself disgusted by the commercial as well. I’ll be dropping National a note informing them of my decision to “walk right past THEIR COUNTER” to any other rental car desk.
qwerty on 22 Nov 2008 at 12:23 am #
I’ve been thinking that they expect us to think of it as “cartoon violence,” and that that should make it more acceptable. In the case of the Hall’s ad, there’s no question that it’s cartoonish, but the events leading up to the violence — the way the character reacts with such disdain to other people apparently expecting some common courtesy from him — make this guy seem like such an ass that I don’t care whether he’s killing people with cough drop heat rays or an axe. The point is that he thinks he’s better than these people, who are doing nothing wrong, and that he doesn’t think they deserve to live.
The National ad takes things further. We know who McEnroe is, and we know that if he chose to do this to someone, he would seriously hurt them. They may as well have a Marine sniper shooting whoever’s going for that oh-so-desirable Buick.
katy on 07 Dec 2008 at 1:38 pm #
yes! both those commercials are annoying, even UGLY…
more permission for more rude and ugly behavior…
but, what IS it with the elevator dude???
EVERYbody knows you go to the rear when you get on an elevator… annoying selfish PUNK is what he is.
grrrr!
thanks for this! i was just telling my daughter about that ad the other day… she lives in the city, on 16th floor… i have never seen the behavior that dude exhibited… it better not start now!