Archive for February, 2007

A Different Thanksgiving Story

Thanksgiving

Here’s a wee hunk of American history that you probably don’t know.

We’re all familiar with the story of the first Thanksgiving, the feast shared by the Pilgrims and their neighbors. No, turkey was apparently not served. Instead, the meats feasted upon that day were most likely venison and duck. But that’s not the piece of history I’m here to teach. I’m here today to talk about the corn that was served that fateful day.

Even without butter, corn on the cob is kind of sloppy food. And when you’re a Puritan, sloppy food is embarrassing food, and embarrassing food is sinful. One particular fellow by the name of Joseph Lymon expressed his disgust with the concept of grabbing the corn in one’s bare hands and gnawing on it, leaving little wet torn up bits all over it. He vowed that he would find a way to make corn eating sufficiently godly, or that he’d make sure no one ever ate it again.

At the second Thanksgiving feast a year later, after the prayer, Lymon stood up to announce that he had found a way to enjoy corn without insulting anyone’s (including god’s, of course) sense of propriety. He held up his invention: small, beautifully polished pieces of wood with one end sharpened. He proudly demonstrated how to insert them into either end of the corn cob and feast on the lord’s bounty without ever having to touch the food with one’s hands. “With my new Corntensils,” he declared, “we can give thanks and praise to the Lord without acting like lowly beasts.”

His announcement, much to his surprise, was met with laughter of derision, and he stormed away in a holier than thou huff.

A week later, Lymon and a few of his followers packed up their belongings (including the colony’s supply of Corntensils) and declared that they could no longer stand to live among the ungodly beasts of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They traveled inland to the west and the south for weeks, until they arrived at a wide river. It was there that they declared they had reached the land promised to them by god, where they would create their own colony, with their own laws, not the least of which would be the law of Corn Etiquette.

Tags: , ,

No tags for this post.

Half Equals More

As long as I can remember, manufacturers have been tacking a description of a car’s features right onto it, for all to see. As certain selling points become more common, cars will stop visually bragging about them and will come up with new ones. Just off the top of my head, some of the features I’ve seen plastered onto cars are as follows:

  • Front wheel drive
  • Fuel injection
  • Automatic
  • DOHC
  • Four Wheel Drive, along with its cousins
    • All Wheel Drive
    • 4 x 4
    • Quattro
    • 4-matic
  • Hybrid
  • 4 speed
  • 5 speed
  • 6 speed
  • V6
  • V8
  • V12
  • Rotary
  • 16 valve
  • 32 valve

HemiOne that’s apparently been around for decades, but that I’ve only noticed in the past few years is ““. My earliest memories of the Hemi idea are of those two hapless schmucks who dream of being able to answer in the affirmative to the question, “That thing got a hemi?”

What I don’t get is the choice of the name “hemi” for this feature. I mean, I can go to the official hemi site and read about it:

What is a Hemi?

Hemi is short for hemispherical, half of a sphere, the shape of the combustion chamber in the early Hemi engines. Why the hemispherical shape?

When you look at a high-performance engine, the valves are canted to position the intake and exhaust ports for best airflow into and out of the cylinder. Most reacing engines, up to the time the Chrysler Hemi was introduced in 1951, had canted valves. So do all Hemi engines — the FirePower/Firedome/Red Ram, the 426 Hemi — and the New 5.7L and 6.1L Hemis. The way to enclose these canted valves in a chamber is the half spherical, or hemispherical shape, which gives best airflow.

Fine. I get what it means. But the “hemi” part of “hemispherical,” just like “semi” and “demi,” means “half”. Doesn’t that seem a bit odd? We’re talking about big, powerful engines, put in vehicles with names like “Magnum,” “Ram” and “Charger”. Now, why do they choose to use names like that for the models? Because they connote big and powerful. They’re ultra-manly. Driving one of these vehicles is a way of saying (or hoping you’re saying) “I am big. I am powerful. I have an enormous willy.”

“Hemi,” while it’s an accurate name from an engineering standpoint, just doesn’t send that message. People know it means half, don’t they? It seems to me that the message this sends is something along the lines of “I’m a big, powerful man with a big powerful dick and I drive a big powerful truck. Why yes, I’d love some tea, but just a demitasse. Any more than that and I’ll have to go pee pee.”

Tags: , , , , , , ,

No tags for this post.

Bush’s Religious Freedom Scam

First Freedom FirstI’ve mentioned before. They’re very much on what I consider to be the right side of the religious freedom debate. That is, they support the idea that freedom of religion absolutely includes freedom from religion.

Today, I got an email from them that deserves to be spread around, so here it is.

First Freedom Faked!

Dear Friend of First Freedom First,

When we learned this week of a newly unveiled Department of Justice (DOJ) initiative titled the “First Freedom Project,” our interest peaked. After comparing it to our own effort, First Freedom First we were deeply disappointed.

First Freedom First would welcome an initiative by Bush administration officials to truly preserve and protect religious freedom in America, but their track record shows that they only believe in half of the First Amendment’s two religious freedom clauses. The DOJ’s First Freedom Project is a scam.

How timely and hypocritical. Next week in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, administration lawyers will argue before the Supreme Court that taxpayers should be denied the legal right to challenge government spending that favors religion.

So this week, they unveil a program that claims to protect our religious liberties. No administration in our history has trampled the First Amendment more than the Bush administration.

Deceptively naming this program First Freedom is a typical strategy of the Bush administration. The title hides its true purpose, just like the USA PATRIOT Act, the Healthy Forest Restoration Act and No Child Left Behind.

In the most religiously diverse nation in the world, religious freedom is for everybody. It’s not the freedom of our government to impose or even favor one religion over others. We invite everyone who cares about religious freedom to compare the attorney general’s First Freedom Project with First Freedom First.

Our petition has already been signed by over 100,000 people and will be presented to political leaders throughout the nation to encourage their renewed commitment to the First Amendment.

To help safeguard separation of church and state and protect religious liberty, please forward the petition to at least one friend.

Thanks again for your support!

All the Best,

Beth Corbin and Bethany Moore of
Donna Red Wing and Eric Shutt of

Tags: , ,

No tags for this post.

Does Mitt Know the Lord?

Mitt RomneyI found this at Crooks and Liars.

Mitt Romney was chatting up a group of people (I don’t know where this happened, but based on the pronunciation of the word “god” I’d say it has to be the Midwest, maybe Chicago) and one man indicated how important it was to him that he vote for “a man who stands for the lord Jesus Christ.” He then went on to say that he’d never vote for Romney because, as a Mormon, Mitt just doesn’t “know the lord.” He’s identified in the title of the video as a “heckler,” but as far as I can tell he was polite in the way he said what he said, whether you think the message was pleasant or not. The crowd booed. They’d have none of this religious persecution.

Romney’s response was so… American. Mitt understands that you don’t have to be a Methodist, a Congregationalist, a Presbyterian or some such thing to be President of the US of A. Why, we’ve got freedom of religion! It brought a tear to my eye.

One of the great things about this great land is we have people of different faiths and different persuasions, and I’m convinced that the nation does need to have people of different faiths, but we need to have a person of faith lead the country.

Translation: You may not like my religion, but at least I’m not some filthy atheist.

I love you too, Mitzi.

Tags: , , , , ,

I’m Spartacus.

Shakespeare's Sister

…and I’m not even a fan of Edwards. Doesn’t make a bit of difference. I’m still Spartacus.

No tags for this post.

CitiWang

Metropolitan Theatre, BostonThis is just wrong.

I may have mentioned that I don’t get out very often. Well, today I was riding along on the dread red line of Mr. T on my way to get my copious locks sheared off. I looked up from my seat, and saw an advert for the ’s production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream at the Citi Wang Theatre. The Citi Wang Theatre? WTF? Since when is the Wang the Citi Wang?

It seems the change was made late last year, according to Wikipedia. This old joint has been through quite a few names, but this latest one, since I hate the practice of corporations slapping their names onto public spaces, is the worst.

It opened as the Metropolitan Theatre in 1925. It was one of a few movie palaces here in Boston. A couple of the others are still around, a few blocks away in what was until recently the infamous Combat Zone (that is, a couple of strip clubs and an adult bookstore). Anyway, the two theatres in question are the Paramount (which has not, as far as I know, been open at all during the more than 25 years I’ve lived in the area, but it seems like somebody works on it now and then) and the Savoy — which was apparently originally the B.F. Keith Memorial, and has been called the Opera House since the late 70’s, when Sarah Caldwell moved her Opera Company of Boston in. I saw Laurie Anderson there two or three times in the 80’s and early 90’s. I don’t think the theatre’s open nowadays.

By the way, Boston used to have a real Opera House, right by Symphony Hall. The story I heard is that it was demolished to make room for a gym or a parking garage for Northeastern University. But I digress.

The Metropolitan Theatre was renamed the Music Hall in the 60’s. In the 80’s it became the Metropolitan Centre (or the Met Centre, as we all called it). I remember skanking my ass off to Peter Tosh and Jimmy Cliff there, some time around 1982 or 1983.

Not long after that, An Wang (of Wang Labs) made a big donation and the place was renamed the Wang Centre. Corporate name? Well, sort of, but as far as I was concerned, it was named for the person rather than the company, so I was ok with it. Besides, they started fixing the place up at that point. It’s rather nice in there now.

In the 90’s, the Wang Centre and the Shubert Theatre across the street merged (their management merged, not the buildings, you silly person), so as the two buildings now made up the Wang Centre, the theatre itself was renamed the Wang Theatre.

citi center logoAnd so it remained until a few months ago, when Citicorp or Citigroup or Citimonopoly — whatever they’re calling themselves — signed a contract to slap their name onto the place, just like they’re doing with Shea Stadium, and turned it into the , which is made up of the Citi Wang Theatre, and… I don’t know — I hope they’re not going to start calling the Shubert the Citi Shubert.

This sucks. I assume people are going to end up calling the place Citi Centre, which people are going to confuse with City Center, down in the big town.

Feh.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No tags for this post.

Fun With Paranoia

Andy Beal points us to this video that suggests that Google may be using all the data it collects for… evil.

Yikes! This means that there may be a clone of qwerty at the Googleplex performing slave labor! And I’ll just bet that the clones there aren’t given access to all the great benefits they give the human googlers: free gourmet food, health care, daycare, massages, company stock, lava lamps… I guess “do no evil” doesn’t apply to artificially generated people.

Tags: , ,

Tags: , , , ,

A Matter of Context

Ah, contextual advertising. Those of you who use Gmail know that it inserts advertising alongside your mail, based on the content in the mail. If someone sends me an email about lederhosen (it could happen), then along the right side of the message I’d see something like this:

Sponsored Links

Lederhosen
Cheaper, better! Save up to 75% on
cultures & ethnicities products.
www.best-price.com/Cultures

Trachten-Mart-USA
Lederhosen - Dirndls - Bavarian
Fashion - for adult & children
HausOfBavaria.com

Buy Lederhosen Now
Find Lederhosen on the
eBay Express Official Site.
www.eBayExpress.com

Lederhosen For Sale
Low Priced Lederhosen.
Huge Selection!
eBay.co.uk

If I sort my inbox by labels, I’ll see an advert above the mail that’s ostensibly relevant to that label. For example, if I’m just looking at mail from NetFlix, I get this:

Movie Recommendations Now - Simpli.com/MovieReviews - Hit the Theater, or Wait for DVD? An Honest Look at What’s Playing.

So what do I see when I take a peek at the messages that Google has automatically marked as spam?

Gmail Spam

Someone actually has to pay if I click that ad. When they placed a bid for searches on “spam” is this really what they had in mind?

Tags: , ,

No tags for this post.

CNN Responds

I wrote a complaint to CNN about their and a response (a second response, you might say) arrived this morning:

Greetings,

Thank you for letting us know you received an erroneous response to the email you sent to Paula Zahn Now. We did experience a glitch that resulted in some of these emails generating a response from our coverage of Steve Irwin’s memorial service. Please accept our apologies for that. This response is to let you know we have verified your original email is in the Paula Zahn Now email box, and has been read.

We also want to make sure you know that due to breaking news coverage of the death of Anna Nicole Smith, the follow-up segment “Out in the Open: What Happened to Love Thy Neighbor” scheduled to air last night on Paula Zahn Now has been rescheduled for Monday night, February 12.

Thank you for taking time to send your comments our way, and for being our valued viewer.

Regards,

CNN Public Information

I did receive the glitch message about Steve Irwin, but I didn’t bother replying to it. And I wasn’t concerned about the air date of of the follow-up, as I didn’t know about it, but I’ll be watching for it on YouTube.

Tags: , ,

No tags for this post.

Congrats to Randfish and Mystery Guest

Danny, Rand and GeraldineYou may have heard about some guy called “JP” who was trying to raise money to propose to his girlfriend on the broadcast of the Überbowl last week. I wasn’t really following along with it myself, although I’d seen a few mentions of it in the various search marketing sites I read. JP had a blog called “” and he was getting some publicity assistance from , a well-known search marketer. JP even got interviewed on Good Morning America.

The plan to get the proposal broadcast during the feetsball game fell through, but JP ended up recording the proposal at a local TV station that broadcast it during last night’s episode of Veronica Mars.

It turns out that JP is none other than Rand Fishkin, aka , a highly respected (and far more famous than your faithful servant, qwerty) search marketer. The video of his proposal to Geraldine, aka is here, and here’s her response. That’s them in the picture. The guy on the left is , Godfather of Search.

The weird coincidence is that I had emailed Rand yesterday because I’d read a post at Think Progress that indicated that this week’s episode of VM was going to be spreading misinformation about the morning after pill. I figured they’d be watching, since Geraldine had written about how much she likes the show, but I had no idea they had a much bigger reason to watch.

So I’m making a rare exception and writing a post here that’s at least somewhat related to my work, just to say congratulations to Rand and Geraldine. Now the big question is what couple name they’re going to be given, since they’re such a famous pair in our little world of search… let me think…

  • Randaldine
  • Gerafish
  • Mystery Fish
  • Gerand
Tags: , , , , ,

Next Page »